Posts Tagged ‘Chemtrails



19
Apr
10

Chemtrails over Charlotte, NC 4-18-2010 And 4-19-2010

07
Apr
10

Chemtrails Over Charlotte, NC 4-7-2010

06
Apr
10

Chemtrails Over Charlotte, NC 4-6-2010

05
Apr
10

Chemtrail Timelapse

03
Apr
10

Must See Time Lapse Camera Of Chemtrails Creating Overcast

H/T http://twitter.com/PIPIL4LIFE

01
Apr
10

More Chemtrails Over Charlotte, NC 4-1-2010

01
Apr
10

Chemtrails Over Charlotte, NC 4-1-2010

11
Mar
10

What In The World Are They Spraying?

http://www.countercurrents.org/murphy030310.htm

By Michael J. Murphy

03 March, 2010
Countercurrents.org

What would you say if you were told that airplanes were regularly spraying toxic aerosols in the skies above every major region of the world? That is exactly what a group of protestors were claiming outside of the annual American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) meeting that was held in San Diego from February 18-22. However, inside the convention center was a different story. The scientists gathered to discuss the “plausibility” of implementing various Geo-engineering campaigns throughout the world, all under the guise that the Earth has a man-made global warming problem that can be solved in-part by spraying aerosol aluminum and other particles into the sky to block the sun. When these scientists were asked about the possibility of existing aerosol programs; they stated that no aerosol spraying programs have been implemented to date. A little confused? Why would protestors gather outside of a meeting making claims that world-wide aerosol programs were under way if scientist were only now discussing the possibility of implementing these programs? Could it be that one of these groups is being deceived?

Mauro Oliveira, the Webmaster of Geoengineeringwatch.org, was one of the protestors. He claimed that the program for Stratospheric Aerosol Geo-engineering (SAG), AKA chemtrails, has been well under way around the world. As a matter of fact, Oliveira stated that witnesses from around the globe claim that heavy aerosol spraying is occurring almost every day over just about every city. He went on to explain the difference between a contrail and a chemtrail. He stated that when a jet airplane flies at a certain altitude, a visible trail of streaks of condensed water vapor sometimes form in the wake of the aircraft. This is called a contrail. Contrails are normal and usually dissipate in a few seconds. They are very similar to when we breathe in cold weather. According to Oliveira, what occurs behind a SAG plane spraying aerosols is quite different. What can be seen is a thick white line also called a chemtrail that lingers in the sky for several hours. The SAG lines are sprayed into the upper atmosphere and then spread out forming what then appear to be clouds. The particles from these aerosols then fall to the ground where they enter our soil and water and can also be inhaled.

Another group of protestors had traveled over 10 hours from a small Shasta County community in Northern California. They became concerned about SAG when many from this community began to see dramatic changes not only in the sky, but also on the ground. Trees were dying, grass was not growing and many farmers were having difficulty getting any crops to grow on their farms. The crisis prompted biologists from the community to take action by testing the soil. The results were shocking. Aluminum, barium and other elements were found to be up to thousands of times higher than normal limits. Such high quantities lead to unhealthy PH levels in the soil which can be deadly to ecological life systems. These shocking results led to additional testing of Lake Shasta with samples from the Pit River arm tributary that tested over 4,610 times the maximum contamination level of aluminum allowed in drinking water in the state of California. Also, peer reviewed scientific studies conclude that bio-available aluminum, now found in huge quantities in rain world-wide, is very harmful to flora and thus the eco-system. Ironically, these are the same substances the scientists are considering implementing in the various potential “future” aerosol spraying campaigns that were being discussed at the meeting.

A large number of other protesters became interested in SAG after experiencing burning eyes, migraine headaches, anxiety, irregular heartbeat, high blood pressure and other health problems on days that airplanes were allegedly witnessed spraying aerosols in the sky. Deborah Whitman, Founder and President of the non-profit environmental organization Environmental Voices and also Producer of the documentary “Sky Lines” is no stranger to these symptoms. She has been hospitalized over 51 times on what she calls “heavy spraying days”. Whitman has committed her life to helping people who claim to be experiencing similar problems resulting from aerosol spraying and gets calls from all over the U.S. in response to her website and documentary. Her recommended health tips can be found at http://www.environmentalvoices.org. Other indicators that possibly validate the claim that SAG is connected to health problems are the respiratory mortality rate, which has risen from eight on the list of mortality to third in the past five years, and the fact that Alzheimer’s and other illnesses linked to aluminum have continued to rise around the globe at astronomical rates since the inception of the alleged spraying.

The AAAS meeting hosted some of the world’s leading geo-engineering scientists. With years of education and even more experience in their respected fields, the scientists looked at geo-engineering issues from many angles. Workshop subjects ranged from, the effectiveness of geo-engineering to potential problems and even touched upon the issue of ethics. According to independent reporter Stewart Howe of Los Angeles, all of the scientists seemed to be looking for solutions to what they believe is the problem of global warming. Howe stated that the scientists appeared to be carefully weighing both the pros and cons of SAG when presenting potential campaigns to address the man-made global warming theory. Many were actually advocating alternative methods to combat this issue due to the potential risks of SAG that include droughts, ozone depletion, less solar power, decimated weather patterns, military use of technology and other various environmental impacts. Howe said, “after witnessing the aerosol spraying for years, I was surprised by the discourse among scientists.” Stewart went on to say that he believes that most of the scientists attending seemed to be separated from the knowledge of any current SAG deployment. As a matter of fact when asked about current SAG operations, leading geo-engineering scientist Ken Caldiera replied that he was unaware of any current aerosol spraying operations and when prompted to explain the long lingering trails left behind planes, he stated that they are simply normal contrails from jets.

David Keith, another leading scientist and expert in the field of geo-engineering, discussed the well-funded studies that have been conducted to predict potential future risks as well as benefits associated with geo-engineering. Some of the potential benefits include a cooler planet, and the reduction of melting sea ice and rising sea levels. Keith discussed what aerosol particles would be most effective in achieving the stated goals of the SAG program. He went on to say that initially sulfur was considered, however, aluminum is more effective and can be used by adding ten to twenty mega-tons per year into the stratosphere. When asked about health related studies that have been conducted to predict the potential risks of adding the particles in our air, Keith stated that many studies have been completed and indicate few risks. However, when asked specifically about the use of aluminum as an aerosol, he said “we haven’t done anything serious on aluminum, so there could be something terrible that we will find tomorrow that we haven’t looked at.” After the meeting, Keith showed consideration to the protesters by initiating a discussion about the SAG program outside where the protestors were standing. When confronted with concerns about SAG deployment from the group, he went on to say that he shared similar views and is against any deployment until proper research is completed to determine potential risks of aerosol spraying. He also went on to say that he is unaware of any current SAG operations, but, would be willing to look at any scientific proof if presented to him.

As the skies around our world continue to change, there is strong evidence that points toward current deployment of massive aerosol operations. Could it be that scientific data and studies are being used to implement pre-mature full-scale SAG programs with-out the knowledge of the top scientists who are involved with the research? If so, what kind of ethical considerations can we expect from the geo-engineering community in the future? It is hard to believe that the strange white lines in the skies witnessed around the world and the toxic elements found in the soil, water and air are from an unrelated source. We the people, in partnership with the scientific community need to challenge not only the environmental and health risks associated with SAG but also the numerous world-wide allegations about current deployment. It is imperative that we become educated and involved in uncovering the truth of this alleged crime against both nature and humanity. The future of our planet depends on it. As concerns continue to grow around the world about this issue, additional information including meet-up groups can be found on various chemtrail and geo-engineering websites.

26
Feb
10

Video: Environmental Deception – The Difference between Contrail and Chemtrail

http://www.infowars.com/environmental-deception-the-difference-between-contrail-and-chemtrail/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

We Are Change L.A.
February 26, 2010

We Are Change L.A. and Mike Murphy present a powerful mini-doc shedding light on the little known geoengineering agenda. Do people understand of what is happening in our skies? What are the implications of atmospheric manipulation?

***No luck with embedding the video. =(

26
Feb
10

S. 517: Weather Modification Research and Development Policy Authorization Act of 2005

This bill was never voted on, but it will show you what our government is capable of.  I say it was never voted on, but has that ever stopped these crazy bastards from doing anything like this?

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s109-517

Calendar No. 319

109th CONGRESS

1st Session

S. 517

[Report No. 109-202]

To establish the Weather Modification Operations and Research Board, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

March 3, 2005

Mrs. HUTCHISON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

December 8, 2005

Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of November 18, 2005, by Mr. STEVENS, with an amendment and an amendment to the title


A BILL

To establish the Weather Modification Operations and Research Board, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Weather Modification Research and Technology Transfer Authorization Act of 2005'.

SEC. 2. PURPOSE.

It is the purpose of this Act to develop and implement a comprehensive and coordinated national weather modification policy and a national cooperative Federal and State program of weather modification research and development.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:

(1) BOARD- The term `Board' means the Weather Modification Advisory and Research Board.

(2) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR- The term `Executive Director' means the Executive Director of the Weather Modification Advisory and Research Board.

(3) RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT- The term `research and development' means theoretical analysis, exploration, experimentation, and the extension of investigative findings and theories of scientific or technical nature into practical application for experimental and demonstration purposes, including the experimental production and testing of models, devices, equipment, materials, and processes.

(4) WEATHER MODIFICATION- The term `weather modification' means changing or controlling, or attempting to change or control, by artificial methods the natural development of atmospheric cloud forms or precipitation forms which occur in the troposphere.

SEC. 4. WEATHER MODIFICATION ADVISORY AND RESEARCH BOARD ESTABLISHED.

(a) IN GENERAL- There is established in the Department of Commerce the Weather Modification Advisory and Research Board.

(b) MEMBERSHIP-

(1) IN GENERAL- The Board shall consist of 11 members appointed by the Secretary of Commerce, of whom--

(A) at least 1 shall be a representative of the American Meteorological Society;

(B) at least 1 shall be a representative of the American Society of Civil Engineers;

(C) at least 1 shall be a representative of the National Academy of Sciences;

(D) at least 1 shall be a representative of the National Center for Atmospheric Research of the National Science Foundation;

(E) at least 2 shall be representatives of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the Department of Commerce;

(F) at least 1 shall be a representative of institutions of higher education or research institutes; and

(G) at least 1 shall be a representative of a State that is currently supporting operational weather modification projects.

(2) TENURE- A member of the Board serves at the pleasure of the Secretary of Commerce.

(3) VACANCIES- Any vacancy on the Board shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment.

(b) ADVISORY COMMITTEES- The Board may establish advisory committees to advise the Board and to make recommendations to the Board concerning legislation, policies, administration, research, and other matters.

(c) INITIAL MEETING- Not later than 30 days after the date on which all members of the Board have been appointed, the Board shall hold its first meeting.

(d) MEETINGS- The Board shall meet at the call of the Chair.

(e) QUORUM- A majority of the members of the Board shall constitute a quorum, but a lesser number of members may hold hearings.

(f) CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR- The Board shall select a Chair and Vice Chair from among its members.

SEC. 5. DUTIES OF THE BOARD.

(a) PROMOTION OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT- In order to assist in expanding the theoretical and practical knowledge of weather modification, the Board shall promote and fund research and development, studies, and investigations with respect to--

(1) improved forecast and decision-making technologies for weather modification operations, including tailored computer workstations and software and new observation systems with remote sensors; and

(2) assessments and evaluations of the efficacy of weather modification, both purposeful (including cloud-seeding operations) and inadvertent (including downwind effects and anthropogenic effects).

(b) FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE- Unless the use of the money is restricted or subject to any limitations provided by law, the Board shall use amounts in the Weather Modification Research and Development Fund--

(1) to pay its expenses in the administration of this Act, and

(2) to provide for research and development with respect to weather modifications by grants to, or contracts or cooperative arrangements, with public or private agencies.

(c) REPORT- The Board shall submit to the Secretary biennially a report on its findings and research results.

SEC. 6. POWERS OF THE BOARD.

(a) STUDIES, INVESTIGATIONS, AND HEARINGS- The Board may make any studies or investigations, obtain any information, and hold any hearings necessary or proper to administer or enforce this Act or any rules or orders issued under this Act.

(b) PERSONNEL- The Board may employ, as provided for in appropriations Acts, an Executive Director and other support staff necessary to perform duties and functions under this Act.

[Struck out->](c) COOPERATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES- The Board may cooperate with public or private agencies to promote the purposes of this Act.[<-Struck out]

[Struck out->](d) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS- The Board may enter into cooperative agreements with the head of any department or agency of the United States, an appropriate official of any State or political subdivision of a State, or an appropriate official of any private or public agency or organization for conducting weather modification activities or cloud-seeding operations.[<-Struck out]

[Struck out->](e) CONDUCT AND CONTRACTS FOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT- The Executive Director, with the approval of the Board, may conduct and may contract for research and development activities relating to the purposes of this section.[<-Struck out]

[Struck out->]SEC. 7. COOPERATION WITH THE WEATHER MODIFICATION OPERATIONS AND RESEARCH BOARD.[<-Struck out]

[Struck out->]The heads of the departments and agencies of the United States and the heads of any other public or private agencies and institutions that receive research funds from the United States shall, to the extent possible, give full support and cooperation to the Board and to initiate independent research and development programs that address weather modifications.[<-Struck out]

[Struck out->]SEC. 8. FUNDING.[<-Struck out]

[Struck out->](a) IN GENERAL- There is established within the Treasury of the United States the Weather Modification Research and Development Fund, which shall consist of amounts appropriated pursuant to subsection (b) or received by the Board under subsection (c).[<-Struck out]

[Struck out->](b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS- There is authorized to be appropriated to the Board for the purposes of carrying out the provisions of this Act $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2005 through 2014. Any sums appropriated under this subsection shall remain available, without fiscal year limitation, until expended.[<-Struck out]

[Struck out->](c) GIFTS- The Board may accept, use, and dispose of gifts or donations of services or property.[<-Struck out]

[Struck out->]SEC. 9. EFFECTIVE DATE.[<-Struck out]

[Struck out->]This Act shall take effect on October 1, 2005.[<-Struck out]

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Weather Modification Research and Development Policy Authorization Act of 2005′.

SEC. 2. PURPOSE.

It is the purpose of this Act to develop and implement a comprehensive and coordinated national weather modification research policy and a national cooperative Federal and State program of weather modification research and development.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act: (1) BOARD- The term `Board’ means the Weather Modification Research Advisory Board. (2) RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT- The term `research and development’ means theoretical analysis, exploration, experimentation, and the extension of investigative findings and theories of a scientific or technical nature into practical application for experimental and demonstration purposes, including the experimental production and testing of models, devices, equipment, materials, and processes. (3) WEATHER MODIFICATION- The term `weather modification’ means the purposeful or inadvertent changing or controlling, or attempting to change or control, by artificial methods, the natural development of atmospheric cloud forms or precipitation forms which occur in the troposphere.

SEC. 4. WEATHER MODIFICATION SUBCOMMITTEE.

(a) Establishment- The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall establish a Weather Modification Subcommittee to coordinate a national research program on weather modification. (b) Membership- The Weather Modification Subcommittee shall include representatives from appropriate Federal agencies, including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the National Science Foundation, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (c) Chairs of the Weather Modification Subcommittee- A representative from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and a representative from the National Science Foundation shall serve together as co-chairs of the Weather Modification Subcommittee. (d) Implementation Plan- Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall develop and submit to Congress a plan for coordinated Federal activities under the national research program under subsection (a) and the plan shall– (1) for a 10-year period beginning in the year it is submitted, establish the goals and priorities for Federal research that most effectively advances scientific understanding of weather modification; (2) describe specific activities required to achieve such goals and priorities, including funding of competitive research grants, training and support for scientists, and participation in international research efforts; (3) identify and address, as appropriate, relevant programs and activities of the Federal agencies and departments that would contribute to the program; (4) consider and use, as appropriate, reports and studies conducted by Federal agencies and departments, and other expert scientific bodies, including the National Research Council report on Critical Issues in Weather Modification Research; (5) make recommendations for the coordination of program activities with weather modification activities of other national and international organizations; (6) incorporate recommendations from the Weather Modification Research Advisory Board; and (7) estimate Federal funding for research activities to be conducted under the program described in subsection (a). (e) Program Scope- The national research program under subsection (a) may include the following activities related to weather modification: (1) Interdisciplinary research and coordination of research and activities to improve understanding of processes relating to weather modification, including– (A) cloud modeling; (B) cloud seeding; (C) improving forecast and decision-making technologies; (D) related severe weather research; and (E) potential adverse affects of weather modification. (2) Coordination with relevant organizations that engage in weather modification research. (3) Development through partnerships among Federal agencies, States, and academic institutions of new technologies and approaches for weather modification. (4) Scholarships and educational opportunities that encourage an interdisciplinary approach to weather modification. (f) Annual Report on Activities- Beginning with the first year occurring more than 24 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall prepare and submit to the President and Congress not later than January 31st of each year an annual report on the activities conducted pursuant to this section during the preceding fiscal year, including– (1) a summary of the achievements of Federal weather modification research, including Federally supported external research, during the preceding fiscal year; (2) an analysis of the progress made toward achieving the goals and objectives of the plan developed under subsection (d), including the identification of trends; (3) a copy or summary of the plan and any changes made to the plan; (4) a summary of agency budgets for weather modification activities for the preceding fiscal year; (5) any recommendations regarding additional action or legislation that may be required to assist in achieving the purposes of this Act; (6) a description of the relationship between research conducted on weather modification and research conducted pursuant to the Global Change Research Act of 1990 (15 U.S.C. 2921 et seq.), as well as research on weather forecasting and prediction; and (7) a description of any potential adverse consequences on life, property, or water resource availability from weather modification efforts, and any suggested means of mitigating or reducing such consequences if such efforts are undertaken.

SEC. 5. WEATHER MODIFICATION RESEARCH ADVISORY BOARD ESTABLISHED.

(a) Establishment- There is established in the Office of Science and Technology Policy the Weather Modification Research Advisory Board to make recommendations to the Weather Modification Subcommittee on matters related to weather modification. (b) Membership- (1) COMPOSITION- The Board shall consist of 9 members, each with a field of expertise in atmospheric science or civil engineering relevant to weather modification, and appointed by the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy as follows: (A) At least 1 member shall be a representative of the American Meteorological Society. (B) At least 1 member shall be a representative of the American Society of Civil Engineers. (C) At least 1 member shall be a representative of the National Academy of Sciences. (D) At least 1 member shall be a representative of institutions of higher education or research institutes with experience in the field. (E) At least 1 member shall be a representative of a State organization that is currently supporting operational weather modification projects. (2) TENURE- A member of the Board shall serve at the pleasure of the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy. (3) VACANCIES- Any vacancy on the Board shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment. (c) Initial Meeting- Not later than 30 days after the date on which all members of the Board have been appointed, the Board shall hold its first meeting. (d) Meetings- The Board shall meet at the call of the Chair. (e) Quorum- A majority of the members of the Board shall constitute a quorum, but a lesser number of members may hold hearings. (f) Chair and Vice Chair- The Board shall select a Chair and Vice Chair from among its members. (g) Duties of the Board- The duties of the Board shall include the following: (1) Advising the Weather Modification Subcommittee on recommendations concerning legislation, policies, administration, research, and other matters related to weather modification. (2) In order to assist in expanding the theoretical and practical knowledge of weather modification, the Board shall advise the Weather Modification Subcommittee on the research and development, studies, and investigations with respect to– (A) potential uses of technologies and observation systems for weather modification research; and (B) assessments and evaluations of the efficacy of weather modification, both purposeful, including cloud-seeding operations, and inadvertent, including downwind effects and anthropogenic effects. (h) Powers of the Board- The Board may conduct public meetings, gather information, and issue reports.

SEC. 6. COOPERATION WITH THE WEATHER MODIFICATION SUBCOMMITTEE.

The heads of the departments and agencies of the United States and the heads of any other public or private agencies and institutions that receive research funds from the United States related to weather modification shall, to the extent possible, give full support and cooperation to the Weather Modification Subcommittee.

Amend the title so as to read: `To establish a coordinated national weather modification research and development program, and for other purposes’.

Calendar No. 319

109th CONGRESS

1st Session

S. 517

[Report No. 109-202]

A BILL

To establish the Weather Modification Operations and Research Board, and for other purposes.


December 8, 2005

Reported with an amendment and an amendment to the title.AEMD23AF

Weather Control Bills

Below are the bills that are related to the “Weather control” subject term. Click the Add Tracker button to the right to subscribe to this subject term.

There is no legislation in this session of Congress for this subject term.

This subject term is no longer used. In 2009, the Congressional Research Service, an arm of Congress that classifies bills, changed the way they categorize bills. Some subject terms used before 2009, including this one, are no longer used and will not apply to bills on GovTrack anymore.

http://www.theorator.com/bills109/s517.html




What This Blog Is About

From the signing of the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776 to the deaths of Founding Fathers John Adams and Thomas Jefferson on July 4, 1826, we had 50 years to the day of pure, God given freedoms. On July 5, 1826, that all changed.

We need to fight back against tyranny so we can get back to those 50 years of our Republic's birth.

Follow me on Twitter - http://twitter.com/ScottGrovesNC

Categories